NDC adoption in managed corporate travel has moved from pilot to default operating expectation in 2026. Concur (via the Spotnana stack), Spotnana Native, and Navan lead on aggregator-grade NDC integration, while Amex GBT NEO, BCD, and CWT have largely closed the gap on Lufthansa Group, United, and American content. Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport remain the underlying connectivity layer for most TMC offerings, but their direct-to-corporate NDC products are now competitive on rich content and branded fares. TravelPerk anchors the SMB end of the index with credible — if narrower — NDC coverage.
The corporate distribution conversation has finally moved past whether NDC is real. The 2026 question is how well a given booking tool actually handles it.
This index audits ten corporate booking tools and TMCs on their New Distribution Capability posture as of mid-2026. The scoring frame, which we apply consistently across the field, has four pillars: NDC level (IATA Level 1 through 4, where Level 4 represents full offer-and-order management), GDS integration (how the tool stitches NDC and legacy content into a unified shop), branded-fare handling, rich content surfacing (seat maps, baggage rules, ancillaries, fare attributes), and fare-family selection fidelity inside the online booking tool.
We treat this as a research-desk landscape rather than a head-to-head ranking. The corporate booking tool market in 2026 is segmented enough — by program size, geography, and carrier mix — that no single tool dominates on every axis. What we can do is map the field.
The 2026 NDC baseline
A few facts set the floor for any 2026 audit.
The IATA NDC standard reached Schema 21.3 in early 2026, with Level 4 certification — full order management, including post-booking servicing — now held by sixty-plus airlines worldwide. The three most NDC-aggressive carrier groups remain Lufthansa Group (which began surcharging GDS-only channels in 2015 and has the longest runway of any major group), United Airlines (which has pushed continuous pricing and branded-fare differentiation through NDC since 2022), and American Airlines (which moved a meaningful share of its corporate-published content to NDC-only channels in 2023 and 2024). Air France-KLM, Singapore Airlines, Qantas, Emirates, and IAG sit in the next tier.
Phocuswright’s 2026 Corporate Travel Distribution report estimates that NDC now accounts for roughly 28 to 32 percent of indirect corporate air bookings globally, up from about 18 percent in 2024. The trajectory is steeper in Europe than in North America, and steeper in North America than in Asia-Pacific.
GBTA’s 2026 distribution working group reframed the buyer-side criteria around the five-item RFP template referenced in the FAQ above. The big shift from the 2024 version is the explicit demand for servicing parity — corporate buyers will no longer accept NDC bookings that require agent intervention for ordinary mid-trip changes.
Skift Research’s 2026 distribution survey of 312 corporate buyers found that 71 percent now consider NDC capability a must-have in an OBT or TMC RFP, up from 44 percent in 2024. The same survey found 38 percent of buyers had directly switched or seriously evaluated switching a TMC or OBT in the preceding 18 months specifically because of NDC capability gaps.
That is the context. Now to the field.
1. Concur Travel (powered by Spotnana)
The 2024 announcement that SAP Concur would rebuild Concur Travel on Spotnana’s travel-as-a-service infrastructure reset the legacy OBT conversation. By mid-2026 the rollout is substantively complete for new customers and well underway for the migration base.
NDC level. Level 4 across the Spotnana-certified carrier set, which covers Lufthansa Group, United, American, Air France-KLM, British Airways, Iberia, Finnair, Singapore Airlines, Qantas, and roughly forty additional airlines. The Spotnana certification path is one of the more rigorous in the field — it requires end-to-end order servicing before a carrier is exposed in the production shop.
GDS integration. Concur retains Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport connectivity for legacy content. The Spotnana-powered shop response unifies NDC and GDS results in a single sorted list with consistent fare-family attribution. Ticketing for GDS content continues through the underlying GDS; NDC orders are managed through the Spotnana order management layer.
Branded fares. Full support across NDC-enabled carriers, with branded-fare comparison rendered in the new Concur UI as a horizontal attribute grid rather than the legacy radio-button stack.
Rich content. Seat maps, baggage rules, and ancillaries render natively. The 2026 release added in-flow upsell prompts for branded-fare upgrades, which corporate policy admins can suppress per policy band.
Fare-family selection. Fidelity is at parity with the airline direct channel for the certified carrier set. This is the single biggest improvement over the legacy Concur Travel stack, which historically forced fare-family selection into a separate post-shop step.
Concur’s positioning in 2026 is as the default enterprise OBT, with the Spotnana underpinnings making the NDC story credible at a scale Spotnana alone could not yet have reached.
2. Spotnana Native
Spotnana sold directly — without the Concur wrapper — remains the cleanest expression of the company’s offer-and-order architecture. The native product is favored by large programs that want the underlying infrastructure without SAP Concur’s expense and policy framework on top.
NDC level. Level 4 across the same certified carrier set as the Concur-powered deployment. Spotnana is one of the few players in the index that was architected from inception around the IATA offer-and-order model rather than retrofitted onto a PNR-based core.
GDS integration. Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport content is available as a fallback and for markets where NDC coverage is incomplete. The native UI exposes the content source in a way the Concur-wrapped product does not, which some travel managers prefer for diagnostic purposes.
Branded fares. Native support with the same attribute-grid presentation as the Concur-wrapped product.
Rich content. This is Spotnana’s strongest pillar. The native shop response includes seat maps, baggage attributes, meal options, lounge access flags, and ancillary bundles in the initial response rather than as secondary API calls — which materially improves shop latency in the OBT.
Fare-family selection. Industry-leading. Fare-family comparison is a first-class object in the Spotnana data model rather than a derived attribute.
Spotnana Native’s limitation is reach. The customer base skews large-enterprise and tech-forward, and the implementation timeline is longer than commodity OBT deployments. Programs under roughly 5,000 travelers will more often encounter Spotnana through the Concur wrapper or through a TMC reseller.
3. Navan Travel (NDC-native)
Navan, formerly TripActions, has spent the past three years repositioning from a travel-and-expense suite for the mid-market into a credible enterprise contender. The NDC story is central to that repositioning.
NDC level. Level 4 across a certified carrier set that closely mirrors Spotnana’s, with somewhat tighter integration on United (Navan’s launch carrier for NDC and a long-standing reference customer relationship).
GDS integration. Navan operates a hybrid stack with Sabre as the primary GDS connection and direct NDC for the certified carrier set. The 2026 release introduced Amadeus connectivity for European content gaps.
Branded fares. Full support with a comparison UI that emphasizes total trip cost — base fare plus bag, seat, and change-fee attributes — rather than fare-name labels. This is a deliberate divergence from the airline-led branded-fare taxonomy and one corporate buyers either love or find disorienting.
Rich content. Strong on seat maps and baggage; somewhat lighter on ancillary bundling than Spotnana or Concur-Spotnana. The 2026 roadmap commits to ancillary parity by year-end.
Fare-family selection. Good fidelity for the certified carrier set, with the caveat that Navan’s UI flattens some fare-family distinctions in service of its total-trip-cost framing.
Navan’s positioning is as the NDC-native challenger. The trade-off versus Spotnana is breadth versus polish: Navan reaches a larger customer base with a more opinionated UI, while Spotnana offers more architectural purity.
4. Amex GBT NEO
Amex GBT’s NEO platform is the largest TMC-affiliated OBT in the field by transaction volume. NEO is built on a heavily customized Sabre GetThere foundation, and the November 2021 acquisition of Egencia consolidated Amex GBT’s mid-market and enterprise OBT footprint.
NDC level. Level 4 for the major carrier set — Lufthansa Group, United, American, Air France-KLM, British Airways, Iberia, Singapore Airlines, Qantas — with Level 3 (offer management without full order servicing) for an additional twenty-plus carriers. Amex GBT has invested heavily in closing the servicing parity gap, and the 2026 release moves several carriers from Level 3 to Level 4.
GDS integration. Sabre is the primary GDS layer; Amadeus and Travelport are supported for specific markets and legacy customer commitments. The NEO shop response unifies NDC and GDS content in a single sorted list, though the merge logic is more conservative than Spotnana’s — NEO defaults to surfacing GDS content when fare parity is within a configurable threshold.
Branded fares. Strong support, with a fare-family comparison UI that closely mirrors the airline-direct experience. This reflects Amex GBT’s deep airline-relationship roots.
Rich content. Solid on seat maps, baggage, and ancillaries. The 2026 release introduced lounge-access and Wi-Fi attribute surfacing for premium-cabin shops.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity for the certified carrier set. NEO’s strength is preserving the airline’s intended fare-family hierarchy rather than reframing it as Navan does.
NEO’s positioning in 2026 is the most credible enterprise TMC OBT with deep NDC integration. The trade-off is platform age — NEO carries more legacy than any of the three preceding entries, and that shows up in the user experience even where the underlying NDC plumbing is sound.
5. BCD Travel NDC offering
BCD Travel’s NDC product is delivered primarily through TripSource, the company’s proprietary traveler-facing layer, with the underlying booking flow running on a combination of Sabre, Amadeus, and direct NDC connections depending on carrier and market.
NDC level. Level 4 for Lufthansa Group, United, American, and Air France-KLM; Level 3 for an additional fifteen-plus carriers. BCD has been deliberate — some would say slow — about advancing carriers to Level 4, prioritizing servicing parity over headline carrier counts.
GDS integration. Sabre is the primary GDS; Amadeus is significant for European markets. BCD’s content-merge logic is among the most conservative in the field, which reflects a customer base that prizes predictability and servicing reliability over aggressive content optimization.
Branded fares. Full support, with a comparison UI that follows the airline-direct taxonomy closely.
Rich content. Seat maps, baggage, and basic ancillaries are well supported. Ancillary bundling — meal selection, lounge access, premium bag allowance — is lighter than the leaders.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity for the Level 4 carrier set; somewhat reduced fidelity for Level 3 carriers, where some fare-family attributes require post-shop confirmation.
BCD’s positioning is as the conservative enterprise TMC choice — strong NDC where it matters, reliable servicing, and a customer base that values continuity. Buyers who want the most aggressive NDC posture will look elsewhere; buyers who want NDC integrated into a low-drama TMC operation are well served.
6. CWT NDC
CWT, now operating as part of Amex GBT following the September 2025 acquisition, retains a distinct NDC product line through 2026 while integration with the Amex GBT NEO platform proceeds. The CWT brand and CWT-AnalytIQs reporting layer remain customer-facing.
NDC level. Level 4 for the major carrier set, broadly aligned with Amex GBT NEO’s certified list. The 2026 roadmap converges CWT and NEO NDC certifications by the end of the year.
GDS integration. Sabre primary, with Amadeus and Travelport supported for specific customer needs. The CWT myCWT online booking tool surfaces NDC and GDS content in a unified shop response, with merge logic that has moved closer to NEO’s during the integration period.
Branded fares. Strong support, consistent with NEO’s approach.
Rich content. Comparable to NEO on seat maps and baggage; slightly behind on ancillary bundling, though the integration roadmap closes that gap.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity for the certified carrier set.
CWT’s positioning in 2026 is transitional. Programs already on CWT have a coherent NDC story; programs evaluating new TMCs are more often shown the Amex GBT NEO product directly. By 2027 we expect the CWT and NEO NDC products to be functionally identical.
7. Sabre NDC for Corporates
Sabre’s direct-to-corporate NDC product — distinct from Sabre’s role as the underlying GDS for many TMCs in this index — has become a credible option for programs that want NDC capability without committing to a full TMC or aggregator stack.
NDC level. Level 4 across Sabre’s certified carrier set, which now includes Lufthansa Group, United, American, Air France-KLM, British Airways, Iberia, Singapore Airlines, Qantas, Emirates, and roughly thirty additional carriers. Sabre’s NDC certification is among the broadest in the index by carrier count.
GDS integration. Native. The Sabre direct-to-corporate product is the cleanest expression of the GDS-plus-NDC hybrid model — legacy content and NDC offers surface from the same underlying system.
Branded fares. Full support, with a fare-family comparison framework that has been refined across multiple release cycles.
Rich content. Strong on seat maps, baggage, and ancillaries. Sabre’s investment in the ATPCO Routehappy integration adds depth to flight-attribute surfacing (Wi-Fi, power, seat pitch) that several competitors lack.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity. Sabre’s deep history with airline merchandising shows here.
The Sabre direct product’s positioning is as the connectivity layer made customer-facing. It is most often deployed alongside a TMC rather than as a TMC replacement, but the standalone proposition is increasingly viable for programs with strong internal travel-operations capability.
8. Amadeus Corporate NDC
Amadeus’s direct-to-corporate NDC offering parallels Sabre’s in structure but with stronger European carrier coverage and tighter integration with the Amadeus Cytric corporate platform.
NDC level. Level 4 across Amadeus’s certified carrier set, with particular depth on Lufthansa Group, Air France-KLM, IAG, Finnair, and other European carriers where Amadeus’s distribution relationships are deepest. United, American, and major Asia-Pacific carriers are also at Level 4.
GDS integration. Native. As with Sabre’s direct product, the Amadeus offering treats GDS and NDC as facets of a unified content layer rather than parallel stacks.
Branded fares. Full support, with strong fare-family comparison capabilities. The Amadeus Cytric integration surfaces branded-fare attributes alongside policy bands in a way that is unusual in the field.
Rich content. Strong on seat maps, baggage, ancillaries, and lounge access. Amadeus’s investment in continuous-pricing infrastructure for Lufthansa Group has spillover benefits across the Amadeus NDC stack.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity, particularly for European carriers.
The Amadeus product’s positioning is as the European-strong equivalent of Sabre’s direct offering. Programs with significant European travel — particularly Lufthansa Group, Air France-KLM, or IAG concentration — frequently evaluate the Amadeus direct product even when they retain a separate TMC relationship.
9. Travelport NDC
Travelport’s NDC product, delivered through the Travelport+ platform, has been the third-place GDS player by transaction volume for years but has used the NDC transition to reset its competitive posture. Travelport+ launched in 2021 and has been progressively layered with NDC capability since.
NDC level. Level 4 for the major carrier set — Lufthansa Group, United, American, Air France-KLM, British Airways, IAG, Singapore Airlines, Qantas — with Level 3 for an additional set of carriers. Travelport’s certified count trails Sabre and Amadeus but the gap has narrowed materially since 2024.
GDS integration. Native. Travelport+ unifies legacy GDS content and NDC offers in a single API surface, which downstream OBTs and TMCs can consume without separate integration paths.
Branded fares. Full support, with a fare-family comparison framework that is competitive with Sabre and Amadeus.
Rich content. Strong on seat maps and baggage; competitive on ancillaries. Travelport’s 2026 release introduced enhanced merchandising surfaces that close most of the remaining gap to the leaders.
Fare-family selection. High fidelity for the certified carrier set.
Travelport’s positioning in 2026 is as a credible third option in a market that had increasingly been described as Sabre-and-Amadeus. The NDC transition has been an opportunity for Travelport to reset that narrative, and Travelport+ is a more competitive product than the legacy Galileo and Worldspan stacks were.
10. TravelPerk NDC
TravelPerk anchors the lower end of the index by program size, focused on the SMB and mid-market segments rather than the enterprise. The NDC integration is correspondingly narrower than the leaders but credible for the target customer base.
NDC level. Level 4 for a focused carrier set — Lufthansa Group, IAG, Air France-KLM, and a handful of additional European carriers — with Level 3 for United, American, and select Asia-Pacific carriers. TravelPerk’s European-centric customer base shapes the certification priorities.
GDS integration. Hybrid. TravelPerk consumes GDS content primarily through Amadeus and Travelfusion (for low-cost carrier and ancillary content) alongside direct NDC connections.
Branded fares. Supported, though the comparison UI is simpler than the enterprise leaders. TravelPerk’s product philosophy emphasizes booking speed and traveler self-service over fare-family granularity.
Rich content. Adequate on seat maps and baggage; lighter on ancillary bundling than the leaders.
Fare-family selection. Reasonable fidelity for the certified carrier set, with the caveat that TravelPerk’s UI is more opinionated about which fare-family attributes it surfaces.
TravelPerk’s positioning is as the SMB-friendly NDC option. The trade-off versus the enterprise leaders is breadth and granularity for ease of deployment and lower total cost. For programs under roughly 1,000 travelers without a deep travel-operations function, that trade-off frequently makes sense.
What the index tells us
Three patterns are worth noting across the field.
The aggregator layer is consolidating around three architectures. Spotnana’s offer-and-order-native model, the three traditional GDSs (Sabre, Amadeus, Travelport) operating as NDC aggregators within hybrid stacks, and the NDC-native challengers (Navan, TravelPerk). Concur’s adoption of Spotnana, and the partial migration of CWT into Amex GBT NEO, both reduce the number of independent architectures the corporate buyer needs to evaluate.
Servicing parity is the 2026 differentiator, not headline carrier count. Several tools in this index advertise more than fifty NDC-certified carriers, but the meaningful number is how many of those are Level 4 with full servicing parity. Buyers should ask for that breakdown explicitly.
Rich content is becoming table stakes faster than expected. Seat maps, baggage rules, and basic ancillaries are now universally supported. The frontier in 2026 has moved to bundle surfacing, total-trip-cost framing, and continuous-pricing integration — all of which are areas where Spotnana, Navan, and the Sabre and Amadeus direct products are pulling ahead of the field.
The corporate NDC story will continue to evolve through 2027. We expect at least two of the carriers currently at Level 3 across multiple tools — likely Emirates and one of the major Asia-Pacific carriers — to push to Level 4 in the next twelve months. We also expect further consolidation in the TMC-OBT layer; the CWT-into-NEO trajectory is unlikely to be the only such move.
For corporate buyers running an NDC RFP this year, the GBTA five-item template remains the right starting point. The tools in this index will all answer those five questions credibly. The differentiation now sits in the details — and the details, finally, are worth working through.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does 'NDC-enabled' actually mean for a corporate booking tool in 2026?
- In 2026 the working definition has tightened. An NDC-enabled corporate tool must (1) ingest IATA NDC Level 4 messages directly from airline offer-and-order servers or via a certified aggregator, (2) render rich content — seat maps, baggage rules, fare-family attributes, ancillaries — inside the online booking tool (OBT) without forcing agent intervention, (3) preserve servicing parity with the GDS-issued ticket equivalent, and (4) reconcile NDC orders into the corporate mid-office for policy, duty-of-care, and expense feeds. Tools that only display NDC fares without order servicing are no longer considered NDC-enabled by GBTA's working group definition.
- Is NDC actually cheaper than GDS-distributed content for corporate buyers?
- It depends on the carrier, the corporate deal, and the route. Skift Research's 2026 distribution survey found NDC fares averaged 3 to 7 percent below equivalent GDS fares on Lufthansa Group, United, and American long-haul, largely because those carriers route continuous-pricing and bundled-fare inventory through NDC channels first. On short-haul intra-Europe and domestic U.S., the delta narrows to roughly 1 to 2 percent. The bigger value driver in 2026 is usually rich content and branded-fare selection rather than headline price.
- Should corporate buyers prioritize aggregator-based NDC or direct airline NDC connections?
- For most managed programs the answer is aggregator-based. Direct airline connections give the tightest content fidelity but multiply integration burden — every airline becomes a separate API contract, certification cycle, and servicing workflow. Aggregators like Spotnana, Travelfusion, ATPCO Routehappy, and the GDS NDC programs (Sabre, Amadeus, Travelport) absorb that overhead. The exception is large programs with concentrated spend on a single carrier group — Lufthansa-heavy or United-heavy programs frequently negotiate direct NDC channels alongside aggregator coverage.
- How do the traditional GDSs fit into an NDC-first 2026 distribution stack?
- The traditional GDS role has shifted from sole intermediary to one channel among several. Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport now operate as NDC aggregators in their own right — their corporate NDC products surface IATA-compliant offers alongside legacy ATPCO-filed fares inside a unified shop response. For TMCs, the GDS remains the system of record for ticketing, mid-office, and accounting on the majority of transactions, with NDC orders increasingly co-existing in the same PNR-equivalent shell. The 'GDS bypass' framing common in 2022 to 2024 has largely been replaced by a hybrid model.
- What should a corporate buyer look for in an NDC RFP in 2026?
- Five concrete items: (1) the list of NDC Level 4 certified airlines the tool can shop, book, and service end-to-end; (2) rich content rendering — specifically seat maps, fare-family comparison grids, and ancillary bundling in the OBT; (3) servicing parity, meaning voluntary changes, involuntary reaccommodation, and refunds can be processed without agent escalation to the airline; (4) reconciliation — how NDC orders feed back into the expense, duty-of-care, and reporting stack; and (5) a contractually defined fallback path when an NDC connection is degraded. GBTA's 2026 NDC RFP template formalizes all five.